Fathers for Families Foundation · Wiri, South Auckland

A mentoring pathway
for rangatahi

A proposal to establish a new behaviour change and mentoring service for young people in, and on the edge of, the youth justice system — built by an organisation that has spent six years working with their fathers.

Prepared for Oranga Tamariki — Ministry for Children · September 2026

Fathers for Families Foundation · with Coreshift1
The result to be protected

You are close to your target. The next gain is in what happens afterwards.

14.6%

fall in the number of children and young people with serious and persistent offending behaviour since June 2023, against a 15% target for 2030

42.5%

of young offenders up to age 20 are re-imprisoned within twelve months of release; 62.6% are reconvicted

40%

of criminal justice apprehensions are people aged 15 to 24, who are 14% of the population

A young person can change while the community he returns to has not. The gain that remains is in holding him there — long after the intervention has ended.

DPMC Government Target 3 · Office of the PM's Chief Science Advisor, 20182
The crossover

These are the same families, one generation apart.

80%

of child and youth offenders under 17 had evidence of family violence in their homes

87%

of young offenders aged 14 to 16 had prior care and protection reports already made to Oranga Tamariki

Fathers for Families works every week with the men whose behaviour in the home the evidence identifies as the entry point to that pathway. Many of those men were themselves the young people this proposal is about. All of them are fathers, with rangatahi in their own homes, already trained to work with them.

This is not a provider entering an unfamiliar population. It is the same population, met earlier.

Office of the PM's Chief Science Advisor, 2018 — review of 16,000+ NZ child and youth offender records3
The delivery record

Six years, and a year that looks like this.

Year to 30 June 2026Result
People through intake860
Actively supported across the service360
Commenced the fourteen-week programme112
Graduated110
Completion rate among those who commenced98%
Service delivery engagements recorded3,469
Participants identifying as Māori or Pacific78.7%

Delivered in Manurewa, Papakura, Papatoetoe, Māngere, Ōtara, Manukau, Ōtāhuhu and Flat Bush — the same catchment as Korowai Manaaki and Whakatakapokai.

Statement of Service Performance, 1 July 2025 – 30 June 20264
Time to impact

Nothing here has to be invented first.

A new provider spends its first year building what this organisation already runs.

Rangatahi would be in a room in term one, not in a design phase.

FFF Service Design Concept and Theory of Change, 20265
What makes this different

The programme grows its own workforce.

Participant
Fourteen weeks
Graduate
Alumni, peer support
Co-facilitator
Delivering alongside
Facilitator
Leading a service area
Tertiary study
Toward registration

One man entered the programme in 2024, was co-facilitating by Term 2 of 2025 and leading groups by Term 3. Another arrived in February 2025 on a court requirement and was co-facilitating by Term 2. Three now lead service areas and completed their first semester of the AUT Certificate in Community Health with a B+ — their first return to formal education since leaving school.

Every cohort produces the people who deliver the next one. The capability compounds, and it stays in the community it came from.

Published on fathersforfamilies.co.nz — in the men's own words6
The wraparound

Seven pathways, not a fourteen-week course.

The GateReferral, engagement, consent, risk and needs assessment, allocation
Core interventionThe fourteen-week group programme
Whānau support and mentoringCase management, safety planning, court and family group conference support, agency navigation, home visits
Health and wellbeingGym, walking groups, peer connection
Whānau and childrenSchool holiday programme, parent–child activities
Leadership and developmentPrevention and leadership to employment, co-facilitation, restoration and mentoring
Alumni and legacyGatherings, peer mentoring, marae wānanga, training the trainers, tertiary study

A young person does not exit into isolation. He transitions into the next pathway, and the organisation is still there in five years.

Te Hīkoi — FFF Service Design Concept, 20267
The programme proposed

Built for this cohort, from a model that works.

Primary cohortRangatahi aged 14–17 — in residence, on bail, under supervision, or known to Police and the Youth Court
Continuity group17–20, where young people leave youth justice and where the re-imprisonment risk concentrates
ShapeA group intervention inside a twelve-month mentoring engagement, referred by your social worker or family group conference coordinator
Delivery teamNew dedicated positions, drawn from and supervised by the existing lived-experience workforce, with youth specialists recruited alongside
SettingRoom, marae and bush — recorded by setting so the question is answered with data

92% of young people in youth justice residences show significant learning difficulties, with mean reading ability at the fourth percentile. These are young people who have disengaged from every classroom they have sat in.

Office of the PM's Chief Science Advisor, 2018 · OT Mentoring Programmes Service Specification8
Measurement

You would receive what our current funder receives.

Coreshift — programme effectiveness and delivery assessment, September 20269
The investment

Costed at the Crown's own published rate.

The Ministry of Social Development invests $17.8 million a year in specialist behaviour change delivery, which it states equates to 121.5 full-time equivalents nationally — an implied $146,502 per position. This proposal is priced on that figure rather than our own.

Full-time equivalents proposed8
Indicative rate per position$146,502
Indicative annual investment$1,172,016
Term proposed3 years
Indicative total across the term$3,516,048

One thing we would ask of you. The cost per young person per day in a youth justice residence, and the equivalent in the community. Oranga Tamariki holds it. It is the single figure that would most strengthen this case, and it cannot responsibly be estimated from overseas data.